Interpersonal communication dating

Posted by / 16-Jul-2020 11:49

Therefore, the attribute of best fit for each model was chosen for analysis of participant consonance (i.e., agreement) with the model.Consonance was examined by analyzing each participant’s consensus rating in conjunction with self-reported data regarding general and romantically-themed media use.

Recent shifts in the perceptions of and expectations for dating, cohabitation, and marriage call for an evaluation of the characteristics associated with how these relationships function.A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to aid in examining how the characteristics were organized within this multidimensional space.Once the model structure was identified, participants (n = 398) were asked to complete an attribute rating task to identify cultural consensus on the model dimensions.We use cookies to offer you a better experience, personalize content, tailor advertising, provide social media features, and better understand the use of our services.To learn more or modify/prevent the use of cookies, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

interpersonal communication dating-17interpersonal communication dating-7interpersonal communication dating-54

In the first part of the study, participants (n = 26) were asked to complete a card sorting task to determine the similarity of model characteristics.

One thought on “interpersonal communication dating”