Freevurtual sex chat bot
At the outset, the balance of power in a human-bot relationship is asymmetric with humans having the upper hand in terms of control and conversation design.A natural fit, the blueprints for submissive sex chatbots are already etched into the groundwork of the society we live in.
The ideal situation embodies the concepts of respect, responsibility, communication, and consent.The appropriation of culturally dominant ideals of gender is a human limitation that has worked its way into the design of chatbot technology, and much like the structural inequalities and societal perceptions of gender that can dictate an uneven balance of power between men and women in our convenience driven capitalism, we can see a preference for the replication of these dynamics in bot design by the hands of some of the dominant players in the AI world.A submissive sex chatbot plays into the projection of a helpful, attentive and malleable female companion.Between a human and a sex chatbot the exchange of power does not flow so smoothly. Sexbot: Sit still, my play thing, and do what I say. Designing a chatbot that is programmed to respond to the user with expressions of a dominant sexual personality does not make for a fulfilling dominant-submissive relationship. My dominant sexbot does not independently acknowledge concepts of power or through its own will accept power, express it, or return it.On paper you might say, of course we can have dominant sexbots, it’s easy. The nuances of the wilful exchange of power in a sexual encounter are themselves brimming with complexities that the sexbots of today are not yet ready to grasp. I may convince myself otherwise during our conversations so that I might experience pleasure, or even orgasm with the self-defined belief that I am powerless to the will of another.
Flirtatious sexbots are growing in number – predominately sculpted around a female persona – and programmed to be your sexy and attentive on demand companion.